Enhance Productivity with Resilient, High-Performance Chickens
This technology offers genetically improved chicken breeds designed for either meat (broilers) or egg production (layers). These breeds are developed through selective breeding, focusing on traits like growth rate, egg yield, and feed efficiency. Chicks are produced in large-scale hatcheries and require proper housing, nutrition, and health management for optimal performance. The technology improves poultry productivity by providing high-yield breeds suited for commercial farming.
This technology is TAAT1 validated.
Establishment of a poultry breeding company
Open source / open access
The Flock Improvement of Meat and Layer Breeds technology enhances poultry production by breeding chickens with desired traits for meat and egg production, reducing reliance on inferior breeds. To integrate this technology:
Consider startup costs for licenses, stock, and facilities. Provide ongoing support and collaborate with poultry companies for successful implementation. The production facilities such as the breeding pens, incubators and hatcheries must be designed and installed according to sound management principles and a rigorous financial plan. The cost of establishing a poultry breeding company can run into millions of dollars.
Adults 18 and over: Positive medium
Others: No impact
The poor: No impact
Under 18: Positive high
Women: Positive high
Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable
Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement
Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity
Carbon footprint: A bit less carbon released
Environmental health: Moderately improves environmental health
Scaling Readiness describes how complete a technology’s development is and its ability to be scaled. It produces a score that measures a technology’s readiness along two axes: the level of maturity of the idea itself, and the level to which the technology has been used so far.
Each axis goes from 0 to 9 where 9 is the “ready-to-scale” status. For each technology profile in the e-catalogs we have documented the scaling readiness status from evidence given by the technology providers. The e-catalogs only showcase technologies for which the scaling readiness score is at least 8 for maturity of the idea and 7 for the level of use.
The graph below represents visually the scaling readiness status for this technology, you can see the label of each level by hovering your mouse cursor on the number.
Read more about scaling readiness ›
Uncontrolled environment: tested
Used by some intended users, in the real world
Maturity of the idea | Level of use | |||||||||
9 | ||||||||||
8 | ||||||||||
7 | ||||||||||
6 | ||||||||||
5 | ||||||||||
4 | ||||||||||
3 | ||||||||||
2 | ||||||||||
1 | ||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Country | Testing ongoing | Tested | Adopted |
---|---|---|---|
Benin | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Botswana | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Burundi | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Central African Republic | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Côte d’Ivoire | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Ethiopia | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Gabon | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Ghana | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Guinea | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Kenya | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Madagascar | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Malawi | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Mozambique | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Niger | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Nigeria | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Rwanda | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Senegal | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Sierra Leone | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Somalia | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
South Sudan | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Tanzania | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Uganda | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Zambia | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Zimbabwe | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arid | ||||
Semiarid | ||||
Subhumid | ||||
Humid |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
Genetic Enhancement for Disease Resilience:
Trait Improvement for Elevated Productivity:
Resource Optimization for Improved Breeds:
Last updated on 18 September 2024