Logo
TAAT e-catalog for government
https://taat.africa/gov/technologies/precision-fertilizer-micro-dosing-for-millet-and-sorghum-yield-enhancement
Request information View pitch brochure

Precision Fertilizer Micro-Dosing for Millet and Sorghum Yield Enhancement

Video image with play icon

Smarter Fertilizer, Stronger Crops: Maximize Growth with Minimal Input

The Fertilizer Micro-Dosing for Enhanced Yield and Efficiency Technology is a practice that involves applying small amounts of fertilizer in shallow holes at the base of each plant. This precise method is low-risk, affordable, and efficient.

3

This technology is TAAT1 validated.

8•7

Scaling readiness: idea maturity 8/9; level of use 7/9

Adults 18 and over: Positive high

Adults engaged in agriculture experience increased crop productivity and income due to micro-dosing, leading to improved livelihoods.

The poor: Positive high

Micro-dosing is cost-effective, reduces fertilizer costs and increases yields, directly benefiting low-income farmers by improving food security and income.

Under 18: Positive medium

While children are not directly involved in farming, micro-dosing enhances household food security and nutrition, leading to better health outcomes for children.

Women: Positive medium

Micro-dosing is accessible and manageable for women farmers, enhancing their agricultural productivity and economic independence.

Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable

This practice is a climate-smart agriculture practice that improves crop resilience to climate variability by ensuring optimal nutrient availability, leading to better growth under changing climatic conditions.

Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement

Micro-dosing equips farmers with a cost-effective strategy to maintain productivity amid climate challenges, promoting sustainable farming practices.

Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity

Reduced chemical runoff from micro-dosing supports healthier ecosystems, indirectly benefiting biodiversity. Minimizing excessive fertilizer use through micro-dosing helps maintain soil and water quality, fostering environments where diverse species can thrive.

Carbon footprint: A bit less carbon released

Optimizing fertilizer application reduces the need for excessive production and application, thereby decreasing associated carbon emissions.

Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health

Targeted fertilizer application reduces the potential for pollutants to enter ecosystems, safeguarding environmental quality.

Soil quality: Improves soil health and fertility

Micro-dosing improves soil health by maintaining balanced nutrient levels and avoiding the adverse effects of over-fertilization.

Water use: Same amount of water used

Healthier plants resulting from adequate nutrition may utilize water more effectively, though direct impacts on water use are secondary.

Problem

  • Nutrient deficiencies in millet and sorghum
  • Inefficient and risky fertilizer application methods
  • Insufficient nutrient replenishment and gradual soil fertility decline
  • Crop failure risk due to drought discouraging fertilizer investment

Solution

  • Addressing nutrient deficiencies in millet and sorghum
  • Providing a low-risk and precise fertilizer application method
  • Fostering rapid crop growth

Key points to design your project

Addressing nutrient deficiencies in millet and sorghum, Micro-Dosing offers a low-risk, precise fertilizer application, fostering rapid crop growth. This gender-sensitive approach potentially benefits women and reduces environmental impact, aligning with climate-smart practices. Overall, it enhances agricultural efficiency, reducing poverty and promoting well-being.

To integrate this technology into your project, create a list of project activities and prerequisites, including:

  • Identifying the fertilizer specific to the crop,

  • Raising awareness with farmers about the benefits of fertilizer micro-dosing technology, 

- Estimate the quantity of fertilizer needed for your project knowing that the total amount of fertilizer used in micro-dosing varies depending on the crop type and planting density. Millet grown at 16,666 plants per ha requires about 50 kg of fertilizer. Sorghum cultivated at a density of 26,666 plants per ha requires about 100 kg of fertilizer per ha. Applying compound fertilizer NPK (15-15-15) at a rate of 60 kg ha-1 is equivalent to 6 g per plant/hill, and DAP (18-46-0) at a rate of 20 kg ha-1 corresponds to 2 g per plant/hill.

- As the technology is adopted in  Chad, Ethiopia, Kenya, Sudan, Tanzania, Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Zimbabwe, include the delivery cost to the project site and account for import clearance and duties if relevant. 

Training may be crucial, and a team of trainers could provide support during project installation, including costs for training and post-training support. Develop communication materials like flyers, videos, and radio broadcasts.

For optimal results, associate this technology with varieties for Better Nutrition and Stress Resistance Dual-purpose Varieties for Crop and Livestock Integration Proactive Management of Striga Infestation.

Collaborate with agricultural development institutes and fertilizer distribution companies for successful technology implementation.

IP

Open source / open access

Scaling Readiness describes how complete a technology’s development is and its ability to be scaled. It produces a score that measures a technology’s readiness along two axes: the level of maturity of the idea itself, and the level to which the technology has been used so far.

Each axis goes from 0 to 9 where 9 is the “ready-to-scale” status. For each technology profile in the e-catalogs we have documented the scaling readiness status from evidence given by the technology providers. The e-catalogs only showcase technologies for which the scaling readiness score is at least 8 for maturity of the idea and 7 for the level of use.

The graph below represents visually the scaling readiness status for this technology, you can see the label of each level by hovering your mouse cursor on the number.

Read more about scaling readiness ›

Scaling readiness score of this technology

Maturity of the idea 8 out of 9

Uncontrolled environment: tested

Level of use 7 out of 9

Common use by projects NOT connected to technology provider

Maturity of the idea Level of use
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Enabling Environments for Sustainable Regional Agriculture Extension (ENSURE)

  • Project funder: African Development Bank & East Africa Community
  • Planned Budget: USD 13.14 million
  • Location: East African Community (Burundi, DRC, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda)
  • Planned duration: 2024–2027
  • Deployment means: On-farm demonstrations, training, digital tools (SMS, IVR, video, radio, pictorial guides), bundled inputs + advisory services, Training of Trainers (ToT)
  • Project main implementer: East African Community (EAC)
  • Project Description: Strengthen agricultural extension systems using digital tools, private-sector approaches, regional coordination, and multi-commodity focus (maize, cassava, rice, drought-resilient crops).
  • Objective: Promote regional extension, enhance advisory services, scale climate-smart technologies, build sustainable private sector–led extension systems, strengthen policy and regulatory frameworks.
  • Expected outcome: Increased adoption of improved technologies, improved farmer productivity and profitability, enhanced access to quality inputs and pest management solutions, strengthened resilience to climate and pest risks, regional market integration, job creation for youth and agripreneurs.
  • Figures of adoption: Target 3 million farmers reached over 4 years, digital extension pilots in 7 EAC states, training of extension agents, lead farmers, cooperatives, and youth agripreneurs, rollout of Pest Information Management Systems (PIMS).
  • Profiles of adopters: Smallholder farmers, women, youth agripreneurs, cooperatives and producer organizations, public and private extension agents, National Plant Protection Officers (NPPOs).
  • Lessons learnt: System-level approaches needed beyond technology delivery, digital tools most effective with in-person facilitation, supportive policy/regulatory environment critical, regional harmonization boosts scalability and cross-border diffusion of technologies. 

Zimbabwe Emergency Food Production Project 

  • Project funder: African Development Bank (AfDB) via Transition Support Facility (TSF) Pillar I, and Government of Zimbabwe
  • Planned Budget: UA 19.6 million (UA 19 million grant + UA 0.6 million government in-kind)
  • Location: Zimbabwe (Mashonaland Central, West, East, Manicaland, Masvingo, Midlands, Matabeleland South, North)
  • Planned duration: Aug 2022 – Jul 2024 (24 months)
  • Deployment means: Distribution of certified seeds and fertilizers, training of 1,000 extension workers, demonstration plots, ICT platforms (e-registration/E-voucher)
  • Project main implementer: Ministry of Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Development (MoLAFWRD)
  • Project Description: Emergency intervention to boost cereal and oilseed production, mitigate food price hikes due to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and strengthen long-term climate resilience
  • Objective: 1) Improve seed and fertilizer availability, 2) Enhance affordability via innovative financing, 3) Strengthen extension systems, 4) Support agricultural policy reforms
  • Expected outcome: 400,000 MT additional production; cereal yields increased from 2 to 4 t/ha; post-harvest losses reduced from 50% to 25%
  • Figures of adoption: 180,000 farmers targeted; 200,000 ha under climate-smart farming; distribution of 2,279 tons maize and 3,539 tons rice seeds (as program targets)
  • Profiles of adopters: Smallholder farmers (communal, A1, A2 scale); 40% women beneficiaries
  • Lessons learnt: High input prices, debt distress, and climate shocks are key constraints; success enhanced by TAAT proven technologies, ICT-based transparency, and private sector-led distribution

South Sudan Emergency Food Production Programme – Project 1 (SSEFPP-1)

  • Project funder: African Development Bank (TSF Pillar I Grant) and Government of South Sudan (in-kind contribution)
  • Planned Budget: UA 6 million (~USD 8.1 million)
  • Location: Northern Bahr el Ghazal, Upper Nile, Western Bahr el Ghazal, Eastern Equatoria, Western Equatoria (South Sudan)
  • Planned duration: 1 September 2022 – 31 August 2024
  • Deployment means: Large-scale certified seed and fertilizer distribution, training (fertilizer micro-dosing), e-registry/digital platforms, radio programs, extension services
  • Project main implementer: Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (MAFS) – Executing Agency; FAO – Implementing Agency
  • Project Description: Emergency intervention to increase production of sorghum, cowpeas, and rice, mitigating food insecurity due to Ukraine war impacts and climate stresses
  • Objective: Boost local food production and strengthen resilience of food systems
  • Expected outcome: Increased crop yields; Rice 2.2 t/ha, Sorghum 2.0 t/ha, Cowpeas 0.72 t/ha
  • Figures of adoption: 100,000 households; distribution of 498 MT sorghum seeds, 498 MT cowpea seeds, 10 MT rice seeds, 30 MT fertilizers
  • Profiles of adopters: Smallholder farmers; 50% women-headed households; 20% youth
  • Lessons learnt:
    • Success Factors: FAO as experienced implementing partner; building local institutional capacity
    • Constraints: Political instability, severe flooding, high fragility, high importation costs 

Countries with a green colour
Tested & adopted
Countries with a bright green colour
Adopted
Countries with a yellow colour
Tested
Countries with a blue colour
Testing ongoing
Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burundi Burkina Faso Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Côte d’Ivoire Eritrea Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Cameroon Kenya Libya Liberia Madagascar Mali Malawi Morocco Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Republic of the Congo Rwanda Zambia Senegal Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Somalia South Sudan Sudan South Africa Eswatini Tanzania Togo Tunisia Chad Uganda Western Sahara Central African Republic Lesotho
Countries where the technology is being tested or has been tested and adopted
Country Testing ongoing Tested Adopted
Burkina Faso No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Chad No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Ethiopia No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Kenya No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Mali No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Niger No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Nigeria No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Senegal No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Sudan No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Tanzania No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Zimbabwe No ongoing testing Tested Adopted

This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.

Agro-ecological zones where this technology can be used
AEZ Subtropic - warm Subtropic - cool Tropic - warm Tropic - cool
Arid
Semiarid
Subhumid
Humid

Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.

Sustainable Development Goal 2: zero hunger
Goal 2: zero hunger

By enhancing crop yields, micro-dosing contributes to increased food production and improved food security. For instance, in Niger, combining micro-dosing with inventory credit schemes has increased household incomes by 34%, enabling better access to food resources.

Sustainable Development Goal 12: responsible production and consumption
Goal 12: responsible production and consumption

Micro-dosing promotes efficient fertilizer use, reducing waste and minimizing environmental impact. This method uses about one-tenth of the fertilizer amount typically applied to wheat and one-twentieth of that used on corn in the U.S., illustrating its efficiency in nutrient utilization.

Sustainable Development Goal 13: climate action
Goal 13: climate action

By improving nutrient use efficiency, micro-dosing reduces greenhouse gas emissions associated with fertilizer production and application, supporting climate change mitigation efforts. The fertilizer industry acknowledges its contribution to global GHG emissions and views the SDGs as a framework for promoting more sustainable production and application practices.

 Procedure for implementing the technology of "Fertilizer Micro-Dosing to Enhance Yield and Use Efficiency":

1. Micro-dosing offers a low-risk strategy for farmers by using small and affordable quantities of inputs.

2. Fertilizer applied in shallow holes at the base of each plant is placed close to active roots, allowing crops to establish more quickly and absorb nutrients and water efficiently.

3. It decreases the investment costs of farmers and increases yield responses even with lower rates of fertilizer application.

4. Proportionally fewer nutrients from mineral inputs are lost to the environment.

5. Combining micro-dosing with organic matter input, water harvesting, and contour bunding techniques enhances nutrient assimilation.

6. The technology is adaptable to various millet and sorghum growing areas in Sub-Saharan Africa, including drylands.

7. It is particularly suitable for resource-limited farmers working on degraded lands who cannot afford recommended amounts of mineral fertilizers.

Last updated on 10 April 2026